<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>opensolaris on minimal.org.uk</title>
    <link>https://minimal.org.uk/categories/opensolaris/</link>
    <description>Recent content in opensolaris on minimal.org.uk</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <copyright>ian</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:23:06 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://minimal.org.uk/categories/opensolaris/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>opensolaris, ntpd, transparent routing and sendto problems</title>
      <link>https://minimal.org.uk/2010/01/11/opensolaris-ntpd-transparent-routing-and-sendto-problems/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://minimal.org.uk/2010/01/11/opensolaris-ntpd-transparent-routing-and-sendto-problems/</guid>
      <description>I’ve been running an ntpd server as part of the UK pool since 2007 but since upgrading from OpenSolaris 2009.06 to snv_129, I’ve had a very poor score. So poor, that for more than a few weeks I’ve been dropped from the uk.pool.ntp.org CNAME 🙁
The problem (after I fixed the missing ptys) manifest itself as a series of entries in /var/adm/messages with varying IP addresses but all of the form:</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>opensolaris zoneadm attach detach problems</title>
      <link>https://minimal.org.uk/2009/06/15/opensolaris-zoneadm-attach-detach-problems/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://minimal.org.uk/2009/06/15/opensolaris-zoneadm-attach-detach-problems/</guid>
      <description>After getting so excited about figuring out what was up with the upgrade to 2009.06 I ran into another, more sticky problem. I rushed into reattaching the zones I’d had to detach to get beadm working by using:
zoneadm -z zonename attach -F
Oh dear: that was a bad idea. The zone appeared to attach but zoneadm -z zonename boot failed and then I discovered it was impossible to delete, rename or reconfigure the zone.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>opensolaris 2008.11 to 2009.06 upgrade fails on beadm</title>
      <link>https://minimal.org.uk/2009/06/11/opensolaris-200811-to-200906-upgrade-fails-on-beadm/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://minimal.org.uk/2009/06/11/opensolaris-200811-to-200906-upgrade-fails-on-beadm/</guid>
      <description>New OpenSolaris release: Yay !
Updater fails on beadm create, and manual attempts also fail: Boo !
After a lot of grumblingGoogling down plenty of dead-ends it appears that beadm in 2008.11 gets very upset when there are Zones attached. A set of zoneadm detach commands later and the updater completed without any problems at all.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
